When and how to say no to your CEO

When “Yes” Sounds Harmless

I saw this issue recently with a senior revenue leader in a fast-growing company. 

He’s smart, capable, and trusted by the CEO — exactly the kind of person organizations lean on when things get messy. 

So, naturally, they started to come to him with extra tasks, knowing he’d be able to handle the workload.

On paper, the things he was asked to make room for made sense:

·       Investor and banking meetings tied to capital raising

·       Recruiting and job specs, since he knew what his team needed better than recruiters

·       Customer service and marketing work, because prior support hadn’t delivered what he needed

None of it was frivolous. Much of it carried the implicit backing of the CEO. Things that were “easy” to say yes to.

Every yes quietly positioned him as the solution — rather than surfacing to the CEO what the business actually needed: clear ownership, resourcing, and accountability so revenue could move.

And when we mapped his time against his actual mandate — driving revenue — something uncomfortable showed up.

He paused and told me, almost surprised: “I didn’t even realize how many things I was carrying that weren’t revenue-related.”

This is where most senior leaders get stuck.

Not because they lack discipline.
But because each “yes” sounds reasonable in isolation.

“The Thing Only You Can Do”

The breakthrough came with a simple reframe: “Ultimately, no one else in the organization can drive revenue. That’s the thing only you can do.”

That became his decision rule.

When something new landed on his plate, he stopped asking, “Is this important?” Because it was important — or else it wouldn’t be on his desk.

Instead, he got clear about the question that really needed asking: “Am I the only one who can do this?”

·       If only he could do it, it stayed.

·       If someone else could do it — even imperfectly — it had to move. 

·       And if no one else in the organization was equipped for it, then it was time to let the CEO know.

This wasn’t about dumping work.
It was about maintaining clarity under pressure.

He didn’t refuse any of the CEO’s requests outright — few leaders want to take on the risk of being the one who shuts things down.

He just renegotiated how the work moved forward.

·       Customer retention planning shifted back to customer service

·       Market segmentation moved back to its rightful owner

·       Cross-functional accountability went back to the CEO — where it belonged

He wasn’t opting out.
He was reassigning work to where it belonged in the system.

A strategic no doesn’t sound like no. It sounds like clarification, sequencing, and tradeoffs — not defiance.

What helped most was changing how he framed the conversation upward.

Instead of: “I can’t take this on” or “We don’t have capacity”, he led with opportunity cost.

“Here’s the revenue upside if I stay focused here”

“Here’s what doesn’t happen if I stay spread thin”

“Here’s what I need from the system to hit the number”

This wasn’t bad news, it was operational reality, clearly articulated.

When Chaos Is Quieter — but Just as Costly

I recently spoke with another client who was navigating this issue. No dramatic CEO demands, just chronic ambiguity.

But when ownership isn’t clarified, the work doesn’t disappear — it flows to the most capable leader.

And you have to learn to manage that flow before you drown in it. 

Especially these days, when team energy so easily feels scattered, and it’s hard to know who to trust, boundaries around your workload aren’t just a matter of preventing burnout — they’re essential to ensuring you get any work done at all.

For this senior leader, saying yes without resources quietly turned the office into the owner of assignments she didn’t control.

So, her reframe became: “Do we own this outcome — or are we supporting someone who does?”

If the answer feels uncomfortable, that’s not politics.

That’s data.

When leaders don’t clarify:

·       Ownership

·       Tradeoffs

·       What stops when something new starts

The burden doesn’t vanish. It lands on the most capable leader — who then has to say no on behalf of the system.

That’s the real cost of leadership chaos. And it’s why learning how to say a strategic no isn’t optional at senior levels — it’s a key part of the job.

The next time you’re asked to take on a new task, ask yourself three questions before saying yes:

1.     Does this directly advance my core mandate?

2.     Am I the only one who can do this?

3.     What outcome am I trading off if I say yes?

The answers may surprise you.

Next
Next

What to do when you don't trust your peers